Author: Y C

  • Taiwan Day 5

    The city is finally catching up to me…..

    Full day of walking and taking public transportation. My feet are killing me like I’d just walked 5 miles over speed bumps. The nice day really helped and got to see parts of “old Taipei”, a place called Xinzhuang which is the first stop/city over the river from “new” Taipei. This is really a suburb of the city itself.

    Crossing the bridge, you were immediately confronted with the sights and sounds of a very busy city remaking itself. Lots of construction and in particular a city-intersection where a new subway stop is being built. This of course just really aggravated the traffic situation. Still, it cool to see a city in action. I met up with a friend and we immediately hit the market area and had some great noodles and side dishes, Taiwan style. THen we walked around the market some more, which is a typical “night market” feel but in the day time. Hawkers of all types. Predominant though is food which naturally appealed greatly to my gastronomic senses. So, in terms of “eye candy” there is definitely quite a bit of the usual suspects but also of the food variety. My eyes being bigger than my stomach can handle.

    Nevertheless, I attacked the issue head…er stomach on this evening, having Taiwan style hot-pot. I ate so much it hurt. Walked around some and then hit a dessert place on the corner in another market area to have some hot red bean soup with taro style gelatin. All in all, great stuff. Blew out my diet and hurt my feet with all the walking. But it was worth it.

    Let’s see what’s in store for tomorrow….

    =YC

  • Taiwan … the education continues

    So it’s like Day 4 here …. and it’s all a blur.

    AJ has been giving me the low-down and the “hi-down” of living in Taipei … kinda like Living la vida loca AJ style. I learned about the Green Party and the Blue Party. The powers of beetlenut and its cultural implications on the people of Taipei itself. The more interesting aspect of vehicular traffic laws, the complete and utter lack of them has been really fascinating. I think by far this has been the most wild-wild-west of the major Asian cities. You find that there are traffic rules permitting far left lane right turns, thereby cutting off 1 or 2 car lanes plus the moped lanes. Now the mopeds are quite interesting by themselves. The appear to “own” the roads but seemingly without rhyme or reason. They’ll go wrong way on a one way road, sidewalks are just another vehicular pathway for them to get where they need to go. Yesterday I almost poked some guy’s eye out with my oversized umbrella when he pulled right up next to me at the curb waiting for the same pedestrian green light to cross. Sidewalks, ah, another Taipei cultural feature. It’s not really for pedestrians. It’s an opportunity for a night market or place to hawk your wares. You can be trying to drive down a small road, and have mopeds and pedestrians in your way, but the sidewalk is empty. Wheee!

    So today the sun is out! Hurrah, it’s a happy day. The non-stop rain has been driving me nuts. I think been like 2 weeks and I’ve barely seen sun. Coldest Taipei winter in like 30 yrs. I think there’s something to global warming. I’m definitely going to be exploring the bus and subway system more. The subway is like Singapore’s very clean and efficient. Time to explore the old part of Taipei.

    More updates laters….

    =YC

  • Taiwan Day 2

    It’s day 2 here and the weather hasn’t changed a bit. Cold, wet, and quite dreary. But thanks to A J, it doesn’t matter a whole lot. Working indoors and Hooters Taiwan, that solved everything.

    The Hula hoops thing was pretty neat. I even won a couple of prizes and we drank enough for me to get some San Miguel beer glasses. Sorry, no pics, I guess I will need to get a digital camera (or maybe someone else can? *hint* *hint*). No trip to Taipei is complete with a trip to the Hooters place. Janet, our hostess was quite attentive. Apparently A J and her have some history which helped out with service.

    Being the ABC in Taiwan has been interesting. Besides trying to think and communicate as best as I can manage in Mandarin, I seem to get pretty good service….from Hooter hostesses :-). I’m getting the full royal treatment, hanging out at some expat places like Mago’s, a cigar and scotch place. Interestingly, the place was full of young attractive women, very few men. The four of us were the only male only group. After all the drinking I lived through it. Not too bad considering the last time I drank that much was hmmm …. a bachelor party.

    So after 48 hrs here, my observations of Taipei are:
    1. It’s like any other large city in the US.
    2. Combination of old town feel and western style metropolis. There are some places that remind of old-town Ipoh Malaysia. Then super modern buildings and skyscrapers with huge boulevards that look like Kuala Lumpur.
    3. Being an expat can be a whole lot of fun here.
    4. Really amazingly beautiful women.

    I should be getting out of Taipei next week to places like Taichun and Kaioshung.

    Til next posting….

    =YC

  • Taiwan! But before that …..

    Day 1:
    Well, I finally made it to this island….. after many fits and starts, I have arrived. Prior to getting here though I had quite the adventure.

    In LA for training, I scheduled to drive up the same day I was flying out of SFO. I was doing great time (about 5 hrs) and then disaster struck — I blew out my front driver side tire. Big-o bang and then clunk clunk clunk. If I had to have a flat then, I lucked out. I pulled over right behind a state trooper who was already there with a tow truck and a big rig that was having problems. I found out that I had a crappy and rusted out spare, no jack and nothing to take the tires off with. The trooper had the spare equipment, the big rig had the ability to pump air in my airless spare and I managed to get to the local Wheelworks and fix my tires.

    All the while I finished packing and got on the road to pick up my friend coming back from Malaysia with his wife. Handed off my car keys to him so he could look after my car and I was on my way to Taiwan. Lucky me! While there the flight was overbooked and they were offering a great deal for people to fly the next day. I was so tempted, $400 travel voucher, $150 hotel voucher and a guaranteed seat upgrade the next night. I decided not to because Tony was waiting and I was anxious to get going. I didn’t need another reason to delay my long awaited trip to Taiwan.

    I settled in quickly and well, before you know it, the family in front had a temperamental baby. Couldn’t stop crying all the way there. It was unreal. The baby was in pain and the parents, I dunno, but I think doing that to a baby is abuse and cruel and unusual for the passengers. The only way the baby stopped crying was to be held and carried but the parents didn’t do it and insisted that the baby lie in the portable crib. Shoot, I would’ve carried the baby and slept standing up.

    In between the crying, I caught Master and Commander and The Other Side of Heaven. Slept some and was pretty well relaxed. The 747-400 was a little cramped, but managable considering in the past two months I’ve lost 1 waist pants size which so helped. If not, these Boeing seats are small. I think the Airbus seats are a little bigger.

    Now I’m typing this in Tony’s office. Taiwan is all rain. Worse than Seattle and London combined. It looks like that for the next couple of weeks which is a total bummer. It’s alright, my trip here is mostly business anyhow. There was some culture shock but not too much. One nice thing is that it looks like the US. Driving from the airport to central Taipei, it looked a lot like Norther Jersey Turnpike into Holland Tunnel. Driver’s are crazy though… Saw a little Toyota cut off a large bus and almost thought there’d be an accident. Didn’t realize a bus could be so nimble but it’s par for the course I gathered later in the day.

    =YC

  • Candidate wives’ redux

    For Worse

    Judith Shulevitz weighs in on whether or not candidate’s wives are fair game to the public wondering who to support. I don’t quite understand her rant.

    I think it must be really quaint to view the family as a single entity with a husband and wife (or 2 parents) and children (with slight variances to this theme). A lot of people in today’s society to think of the family unit as 2 individuals plus accessories (could be kids, could be homes, could be anything in the world). Color me old fashioned and traditionalist, but the family unit is not 2 individuals going about their lives; it is a single entity with a common goal and working toward that common goal. The root of family’s destruction stems from the idea that our own selfish goals and needs are attainable and do not need to be sacrificed nor compromised. We are, after all, highly capable individuals living to carpe diem.

    As a single guy, I believed that people ought to take advantage of all opportunities, explore all possibilities and not limit oneself. Life is an adventure and it should be lived in that manner. You know, Captain Kirk style! On the other hand, I have also maintained that one of the single most selfless acts an individual can make is to get married. How do I arrive to this conclusion? Simple. Going from a single existence (e.g. man or woman is an island) to a shared one requires immediate and uncompromising sacrifice of one’s own interest. No longer can you consider yourself in a vacuum, or make unilateral decisions about how to live your life. You know need to consider your life partner. A successful marriage requires input from another person(s), absolutely needs compromise to sustain it, and requires communication beyond your inner cranial sanctum. This is not easy to do. As divorce rates and polls clearly show, it’s neither easy, nor successful. The two individual model has been an abject failure.

    So when in a marriage, it is even more important to engage in family planning (i.e. how many kids?), financial planning (i.e. more than, do I have enough to hit up the ATM machine) etc. All of this requires considering a lot of issues beyond the “me, myself and I” person. So when someone embarks upon a political journey to the White House, it is perfectly normal to ask, well, who’s his/her other (better) half? Everyone knows, that it takes a strong and successful partnership to make a marriage work.

    =YC

  • More political analysis

    Dean, Lobotomized

    I saw snipits of that interview. Shocked to see Dr. Steinberg (aka the Mrs. Dean). Diane Sawyer made the same point I did and I think it’s totally appropriate:

    “Dr. Judith Steinberg, M.D., explained that she stays at home because she has her own private practice and my patients are my patients and they really depend on me and I really love it. It’s not something I can say, “Oh, you can take over for a month.” It just doesn’t work like that.”

    Sorry, doc, but it does work like that. Your hubby is interviewing for the biggest job in the country, arguably the whole world, President of the United States of America. Guess what your job is? Not Doctor, it’s First Lady.

    I think Dean is sunk. He hasn’t recovered from losing Iowa. Now he could pull second in Hampshire which would float him for a while but I think Edwards and Clark are going to be the voter’s favored choice over Dean. Not sure whether Kerry is going to end up being the winner at the end of the race. I don’t think he can beat Bush. I’m pulling for Clark now but the numbers don’t look good for him. Dean will end up being like what Senator McCain was in 2000. Everything but the winner of his party’s nominee for President.

    =YC

  • My NY Times Archives

    Wait, You’re Not Chinese?

    May 30, 2002
    By PARI CHANG

    I RECENTLY married and took my husband’s name: Chang. I am
    white and I am Jewish and now I am Chinese – at least on
    paper. I grew up on 1970’s feminism; I went to law school,
    became a professional, and always imagined I would keep my
    birth name to celebrate my selfhood. Yet when I married a
    Chinese man, I realized that I could support our marriage
    best by changing my name to his.

    Hyphenation was an option, but hyphenated names often
    create a cumbersome jingle. In my case, Berk-Chang. It
    sounded like a stomach ailment (“I’ve been in the bathroom
    all night with the Berk-Changs”). I thought of keeping my
    birth name but did not want the burden of repeatedly
    explaining, “My husband is Chinese, you know.” As my
    wedding day approached, I decided to take Chang as my last
    name and, by adding “Asian” to “woman” and “Jew,” represent
    three groups at once.

    People sometimes take offense when they discover that I am
    not Chinese, as if I were engaged in a form of false
    advertising. Friends recalled the “Seinfeld” episode in
    which Jerry speaks to a woman named Donna Chang after
    dialing a wrong number, asks her out and is disappointed to
    find she is a white woman from Long Island. She had
    shortened her name from Changstein.

    When a group of women friends from out of town unexpectedly
    visited me in Manhattan, I called a popular Chinese
    restaurant and asked if it could possibly seat eight people
    that evening. “You need to call further in advance for a
    party that large,” the hostess told me. “I have only 11
    p.m.” I asked to be put on the waiting list and gave her my
    name. Then I heard the rustling of pages. “Well,” she said,
    “I could squeeze you in at 8:30.”

    When we arrived, I announced my name. “Chang party? You’re
    the Changs?” the hostess said. I imagined her in front of a
    mirror, rearranging an awkward ensemble. Open the button?
    No. Belt it? Still wrong. “That’s us,” I said. I felt
    guilty as she begrudgingly led us to our table, but what
    are we Donna Changsteins of the world to do? Should I have
    interjected on the telephone that afternoon, “Incidentally,
    ma’am, I am not Chinese – but my husband is”?

    I also unwittingly confused the personnel department at the
    law firm where I practiced at the time of my wedding. After
    I notified it that I had changed my name from Pari Berk to
    Pari Chang, a switch was made in the company directory and
    on my office door. I quickly learned that this meant the
    assumption of a completely new professional identity. I
    received the following e-mail message from a work friend
    the next day:

    1. Who the heck is Pari Chang?

    2. Does she count in the firm’s minority statistics for
    recruitment purposes?

    3. Do the Asian attorneys now view her as competition for
    the partnership?

    During recruitment season, people in the personnel
    department, not having met me, must have assumed I was
    Asian, and asked me to interview anyone who was of Asian
    descent. No doubt some of the candidates I interviewed were
    perplexed. I noticed a few sidelong glances that suggested
    “Is she half?” I steered the conversation toward the tired
    matter of balancing a legal career with a personal life so
    that I might interject that I was recently married and
    offer a clue to the mystery of a white girl named Chang.

    I do not blame people for assuming that I am Chinese – my
    name is Chang; it is a fair assumption. Responses sometimes
    go beyond surprise, however. Acquaintances often boldly
    announce their approval of Geoffrey as my husband. “I think
    it’s wonderful,” they comment. Then they add that he is
    handsome and “so tall!” Those of the more boorish variety
    shout, “Pari Chang!” when they see me, as though my name
    were some kind of verbal high-five.

    As time passes, I feel emboldened by my new identity.
    Losing my birth name, ironically, has been for me a matter
    of self-definition. I am tickled by the irony of having
    made a modern decision by doing the most traditional of all
    things wifely: taking my husband’s name.

    We were lucky, because both sets of parents approved. They
    met for the first time before the wedding at an authentic
    Chinese restaurant chosen by Geoffrey’s dad. My dad thought
    he would wow them with his affinity for moo shoo chicken,
    his confidence in the wisdom of fortune cookies. My mom
    asked me if Geoffrey’s parents were aware that Jews love
    Chinese food. But I couldn’t help wondering what my father
    would say if the duck was presented with its neck intact.
    He is a steak-and-potatoes man, a Hebrew Tony Soprano
    without the mob, owner of a wholesale meat business in
    Brooklyn. Geoffrey’s dad, Julius, is a physicist.

    At first, my dad spoke slowly and clearly when addressing
    Julius. Had I not popped a sedative before dinner, I might
    have snapped, “Dad, he speaks English.” (Geoffrey’s father
    moved to the United States in the 1950’s.) My parents
    relaxed as Julius told stories of his teenage years around
    the Jewish neighborhood in Skokie, Ill., where he went to
    high school. They even tasted the whole-fish soup with
    enthusiasm. We drank wine and discussed pop culture,
    gossiped about celebrities.

    “So, who is Chinese in Hollywood?” my father suddenly
    blurted. “What about Mista Miyagi, from `Karate Kid’ – is
    he Chinese?”

    Julius, bless him, answered my dad with grace. “Miyagi?
    Japanese.”

    “Oh! How about Odd Job, from James Bond – is he Chinese?”

    “Odd Job? Supposed to be Korean, but it’s a Japanese
    actor.”

    In his unorthodox way, my dear father was trying to cozy up
    and learn. Julius knew this; he could feel the effort at
    connection beneath the impropriety. In fact, both of my
    parents and my extended family have welcomed Geoffrey (and
    embraced my decision to change my name) – and vice versa.

    Still, they try to weave tapestries from stray threads. It
    so happens that Geoffrey’s first cousins are half Jewish.
    Their name is Gottlieb. My grandmother, during our Sunday
    telephone chats, never fails to ask, “And the Gottliebs,
    how are they?” The Gottliebs, Grandma, are agnostic. “Doing
    well,” I tell her.

    The Chinese are not unlike us, my family likes to say. They
    joke that Chinese and Jewish women both play mah-jongg. And
    they think of Chinese and Jewish families as close-knit.
    Don’t they both value good educations and have children who
    are diligent students, superstars at math?

    When Geoffrey laughs, his eyes are smiling moons. When he
    sleeps, his lashes are like caterpillar legs, straight and
    stiff. I hope our children will have caterpillar-moon eyes
    and will know Jewish culture.

    We had a Chinese banquet for a rehearsal dinner, and a
    rabbi officiated at our wedding. We live on a continuum,
    hovering between East and West. I took Chang as my name to
    honor this blend, and our choices.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/30/fashion/30CLOS.html?ex=1023963532&ei=1&en=3298f90b59efbff6

  • I think this is a PI lawyer’s wet dream

    It’s a jolt when tragedy repeats itself

    No, sorry, it’s a tort and one that some lawyer is gonna cash in on. How stupid is this….

  • Random thoughts

    This is a beautiful story. History and learning from its unforgiving mistakes is all too lacking in today’s society. See Fighting Hate, Across Cultures and Generations

    Woo wee! This is cold stuff eh? NYC Weather report

    Hurray, hurrah! About time some one important went to jail. Former Enron executives agree to plead guilty I think Elliott Spitzer is my Man of the Year. Spitzer’s the guy who’s looking out for the little guy cleaning up all the corporate disgrace. Corporate misdeeds run amok, just like our “MBA President”. Birds of a feather, flock together.

    Marriage is good but uhhh … Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Promotion of Marriage ? According to the article, aimed to promote marriage in low-income couples? I don’t think that’s the problem here. How about using some of that money to invest into the US economy and education? Or, if truly targeted “to help couples develop interpersonal skills that sustain “healthy marriages.”, then make mandatory counseling. That will cut down on divorces. You get a lot more divorces when you get power couples like Howard Dean and Dr. Steinberg. Each one its own captain. Eventually, the partnership will be split in two and the kids get screwed. Everyone thinks that divorces can fix your mistakes and everything will go fine. No, it just makes it worse. If divorce is an option, then don’t get married. Period. There was a pointed satirical article about conservatives and marriage a couple of months ago. I am sorry I didn’t save it.

    #Rant off

    =YC

  • Flashpoint for women’s issues

    Very interesting article in the NYT (Dean’s Wife Shuns Politics) about Dr. Steinberg, Howard Dean’s wife, during all his campaign efforts. It seems to me that the writer was drawing attention to how strange it seemed that a wife could be so removed from such an important part of a husband’s life.

    Lots of issues abound here.

    1. It’s a blow for feminism. Great that a woman can be successful career mom and mother. Does that mean a wife couldn’t also support her husband’s goals. He’s running for the President of the US and is the leading Democratic nominee for crying out loud.
    2. Blow against traditionalism. How is it that a woman balancing personal, professional life can not also support her husband’s personal and professional goals? Dr. Steinberg is quoted: “I think a lot of couples are like us, where they have two career-couples, and both careers are very important to the individuals,” Dr. Steinberg, 50, said in an interview this fall. “Each individual has to do what works for her. What works best for me, and what I’m best at, is being a doctor.”

    Yes, but the perception is there is no visible support for Dean’s husband’s presidential efforts . How does that play out when you’re asking voters to support Howard Dean but his own wife stays at home? See John Kerry and Terry Heinz. Slate had an article questioning why Heinz wasn’t supporting her husband financially when he was trailing so badly in the polls. Seems like a case of too little too late for them now. Kerry is going down like a Gore, career politician going down and who will never be president.

    In today’s age, balancing two careers, family and personal needs is really hard (I think life has gotten a lot more complex than past generations). I think this is an example of the balance being out-of-whack. Dr Steinberg comes across the article as overly self-centered on her own needs. Being a politician and running for office, this she-goes-her-way, I-go-my-way doesn’t fly well. It’s a big sacrifice for everyone and everyone needs to be on the same wagon pulling the same horses.

    Latest polls claim that Clark and Dean are neck and neck and both liked by the Dems. We’ll see how it goes. Looks like the Dean express has hit some bumps. Clark is becoming a viable candidate and alternative to Dean who still comes across to me as being too slick and untrustworthy.

    =YC