Blog

  • Aloha, “Lost”

    Re: the “Lost” series finale – I’m still digesting it.  There is so much to be said and yet maybe nothing needs to be said; I could just leave it to the sublime, but really, “Lost” is a show that activates discussion and thought.

    On a sidenote: I thought ABC overdid it with the commercials; rendering the series finale into a 2 1/2 hours just for commercials?!  Come on!  I can’t begrudge the network for wanting to profit from the event, but they really got excessive.

    My initial reaction to the series finale was of some kind of emotional resolution.  I felt a little teary over seeing Jack seeming to be at peace, with Vincent the dog by his side at the end.  After all that turmoil, perhaps it was a satisfactory ending to realize that the Sideways Universe is a waiting area before the loved ones get be together again to the next life or the next world or whatnot (fitting to whatever belief system one has) and that our castaways were able to find their own resolutions and reunite.

    Not that I quite enjoyed the Jimmy Kimmel post-series finale show (some of the Q&A from that audience left much to be desired and the skits of alternate endings weren’t that funny to me), but I liked Kimmel’s title of “Aloha,” as I thought that the phrase “aloha” best summed up the series finale – as a phrase known to be both “Hello” and “goodbye.”

    But, ok, aloha…now what?  Good luck and farewell and welcome to the next thing, as Jack, Kate, Sawyer, Juliet, Jin, Sun, Sayid, Locke, Hurley – and even returning old friends like Boone, Shannon, Charlie, and Claire – move forward.  Is that all?

    I ultimately realize what a head-twister (not to mention heart-rending) the finale was.  The “real” universe – well, the island is saved and Jack can let go and … death is death; life is life; and what happens, happens; c’est la vie; love is the answer; and humans are… human.

    Was the series about science or faith, or both?  Was it about having free will or power – do we have choices or none at all?  Or was it all of the above?  (For instance, Jack chose to step up and succeed Jacob, and Jacob wanted to give the candidates a choice, which he did not have, because of his crazy adopted mom.  Meanwhile, Hurley didn’t want to be the successor, but it wasn’t like he had a choice; it wasn’t as if Jack, as human as he was, was going to give the job to Ben either.  And, perhaps only Hurley would be so compassionate and willing to ask Ben for help and to be his “Number Two,” I suppose!).

    Is it okay or not okay not to have all the answers to the plots?  I probably would have preferred more balance between characters and plots during this last season, and wished we had more time to deal with the implications (or even to have given Eloise, Charles Widmore, Daniel Faraday, Charlotte, Desmond and Penny more time to resolve their stories, and I could have lived without the head-scratching stuff – like the senseless deaths of Ilana and Widmore’s staff) – but I’m actually more okay with not having all the answers or all the mysteries resolved.  (I survived many other series finales and I’m okay – really).

    As someone who hasn’t been a rabid fan, speaking as a television viewer who wants good tv, I still stand by what I have said about the season premiere of the last season of “Lost”: I want something entertaining and with some kind of heart.  I would hope that the writers would care about their characters, and I think Cuse and Lindelof did care (at least, I felt that they did in this series finale).  While I cannot quite feel “happy” in the kind of ending that there was – that all roads leads to a life’s end, and boy is that sad or what? – it is an ending and we watched the characters seem okay with that – if not happy to be together again, even if it was in the afterlife, and that of itself is actually uplifting (there’s always hope, in some fashion).

    Am I making any sense?  Did the ending of “Lost” make sense?  Maybe not for everybody, not even for me (if I keep thinking about it, and I probably should stop that already!).  I’m relieved that Jack is at peace, even if he never really got to be a real dad to a son (in the alternate universe, he did get to be what he missed out on – where he did resolve his losses, even with his own father – but is it really the same?  Hmm.  Not sure.).  I’m sorry that Jack’s son was never “real.”  (well, he was real enough to Sideways Jack).  I’m pleased that Sawyer and Juliet are back together, even if it might have taken Sawyer awhile to get there.  And, even Kate made her peace with Jack and Claire (in both universes).  But, the ones who were left behind – Sun and Jin’s daughter; Aaron; Walt; Jack’s son who never existed – well, does the Island leave a legacy to them?  To anyone?

    The series finale isn’t perfect for not quite answering questions to the plots, but it captured the essence of the show, which made me feel okay and almost wanting to revisit it all over again.  Was it sad?  To me, yes, but it did not feel completely wrong or inappropriate to me.  There was a subtlety that left my imagination going; it seems to me that the discussion on “Lost” will never end, even if the series itself is over.

    “Lost” as a series reminds me of something a college professor of mine once said about the great books we read – along the lines that if it makes an impact on us, that if it makes us think or react however way – that is the power of reading a great book.  I think “Lost” as a series has been something really moving and it worked for me.  It’s not perfect, but it made me care.

    Great acting from Matthew Fox, Michael Emerson, and Terry O’Quinn; even kudos to the rest of the cast – they held everything together.

    Aloha, “Lost.”  See you in the next life.

    Update:

    I posted a shorter, less rambling version of this on comments on David Bianculli’s blog TV Worth Watching (which is a great blog, by the way, and I liked and agreed with Bianculli’s thoughts about the series finale).

    Other posts on the series finale that I’ve taken particular notice: Time’s James Poniewozik with his Lost Watch series finale post; Poniewozik’s post on links to others’ posts; Alan Sepinwall’s thoughts; and the amazingly in-depth posts (part 1 AND part 2!) by Entertainment Weekly’s Jeff “Doc” Jensen.

  • LOST MUSIC VIDEO – LOST! COLDPLAY

    Source: www.youtube.com
        This week's (spoiler-free) soundtrack – still trying to wrap my mind around the finale…    
  • Who You Gonna Call?

    Source: www.youtube.com
        Support your library and remember to call the real Ghostbusters!    
  • Don't Dream It's Over (Acoustic) ~ Sixpence None the Richer (Diana Li)

    Source: www.youtube.com
        Today's soundtrack – Happy Monday    
  • Catching Up

    Sorry to have fallen behind; life and other things occurred.

    Like… Arizona passing odd laws: like their anti-illegal immigration law (still not sure how the law enforcement goes about stopping to identify who’s illegal without causing a whole host of other problems and not to mention where Arizona’s going to get the money to enforce their law and the litigation involved; granted, there is a whole context as to why Arizonan state gov’t decided to pass the law, there had to be a better way to do it without irritating people) and their law to end ethnic studies (primarily out of fear the ethnic studies is about producing anti-Americans).

    I’m no immigration law expert, but from what I scanned of the Arizona law is that it leaves much to be desired, since it leave room for abuse and then, if law enforcement can’t or won’t enforce it, some civilian can sue the municipality or state for not enforcing the law – more room for abuse.

    As for the ethnic studies issue, speaking as someone who has taken one or two ethnic studies courses back in college:

    (a) Arizona really is freaking crazy about that issue (apologies to Arizonans out there, but seriously!).

    (b) I’d suggest that their governor and legislators take an ethnic studies class and figure out that ethnic studies do not teach people to be anti-American; if anything, it’s about understanding how complex our country is; it’s also not about “segregating” people either (and if anything…, maybe encouraging each other to take classes that aren’t about our own cultures and moving beyond what we think we know might improve race relations – or even a lack thereof – in this country); good grief.

    (c) (insert eye roll here).

    I’ll step off my soap box now.

    The news of Justice John Paul Stevens’ retirement and the selection of his replacement took a lot of attention.

    (a) There was, of course, coverage on who was Stevens and his legacy (see Adam Liptak’s article from the NY Times).

    (b) There were articles about the folks on the short list and even a last minute addition to the short list (I liked this article in the NY Times about Judge Sidney Thomas of Montana, appellate judge of the 9th Circuit; he seemed refreshingly different – empathetic, smart, and not from the usual parts of the country).

    In the end, President Obama has selected US Solicitor General Elena Kagan; we might have a fourth woman on the US Supreme Court – quite something to think about.

    Of course, all the criticism came right away, from all sides.  Frankly, the one argument that I have found most hypocritical is the one on how Kagan’s lack of judicial experience is a lacking.  Let’s not forget that, before 1972, a lot of US Supreme Court justices had no prior judicial experience – and that the last one in that category was the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist.

    Plus, Kagan’s not exactly comparable to Harriet Miers, President George W. Bush’s original pick to replace Justice O’Connor.  (I’m not exactly saying that a Harvard Law graduate is better than anyone else; it’s just that the former Harvard Law dean might have more thoughts on constitutional law issues than a corporate lawyer like Miers was).

    Strangely, though – with the selection of Kagan, four out of the five boroughs of NYC might be represented on the Supreme Court.  I doubt that this is what most people had in mind as “diversity,” but it is funny to think that NJ has more representation on the Court before Staten Island will (in the form of Alito and even NJ-born Scalia).  See the article by James Barron of the NY Times on this subject.  The Daily News had some article on the subject of Staten Island feeling left out, but I’m not going to make suggestions.

    The sad news that NBC is canceling “Law and Order,” so that now, it only ties “Gunsmoke” as longest running tv drama.  Articles include:

    (a)  Its effect on NYC economy is considered by the NY Times; Daily News also covered how the acting community had built resumes via L&O.

    (b) Some tv criticism: Daily News’ David Hinckley talks about how L&O covered the basicsNY Times’ Alessandra Stanley just had her own observations.

    Personally, I think NBC has to figure out how to fill the 10pm-11pm time slot and they’re not going to have any good transition without L&O, which – with its current cast – was a lot more entertaining than its still-extant spinoffs L&O: SVU and L&O: Criminal Intent.  NBC couldn’t even plan a cancellation with enough advancement to let L&O have a proper series finale?  Come on!

    Plus, many questions!  Are we really going to lose the most entertaining legal crew in the form of DA McCoy, Exec. ADA Cutter, and ADA Rubirosa?  Will Cutter ever realize he can only go so far with his kooky legal ethics?  Will we ever get a closing argument from Cutter or Rubirosa?  What will we do without McCoy as the DA who wonders what is he getting into with the DA thing?

    And, what about Detective Lupo?  Is he still taking night classes at Triscribe’s alma mater law school?  Is he ever going to graduate?

    Good read in the NY Times:

    Really good stuff from Michael Kimmelman on who “owns” art? Of the fight for art is for nationalist or political purposes, does the art really matter for the “owner”?  ex., the dispute between Greece and Great Britain over the Elgin Marble (or, to Greece, simply the Parthenon marble, more or less stolen from Greece).  Isn’t it about giving people the opportunity to see the art?  I especially liked how Kimmelman closed the article: “We’re all custodians of global culture for posterity…. Neither today’s Greeks nor Britons own the Parthenon marbles, really.”

    Recent museum visiting:

    at the Morgan Museum and Library; saw the Magna Carta, the basis of the concepts of rule of law and basic rights like right to trials and juries. (The Magna Carta is staying in town due to delays in shipping it back to England because of the Icelandic volcano ash cloud).

    Recent play viewing:

    Watched the roving Shakespeare at Columbia University: King’s Crown Shakespeare Troupe did “Measure for Measure.”  Cool stuff; the college kids were so talented.  Plus, the play’s about how a bad law can cause serious problems.

    Recent television viewing:

    “Hamlet” on “Great Performances” on PBS – David Tennant (the 10th Doctor of “Doctor Who”) as Hamlet and Patrick Stewart (Capt. Jean-Luc Picard of “Star Trek: The Next Generation”) as Claudius.  “Great Performances” website has the capability of letting the viewer watching the movie on-line temporarily; check it out while you can!

    “Lost” — the road to the series finale is paved with much confusion.  I can live with some mysteries left as mysteries, but that last episode – where the back story of Jacob and the Man in Black is somewhat revealed – was strange and left wanting.

    Plus, finally got to watch an episode of “Justified” on FX.  Entertaining.  Very Leonard Elmore.  Much violence.  But, strong acting and writing.  And, the lead actor, Timothy Olyphant – it doesn’t hurt that he’s easy on the eyes.

    APA Heritage Month continues:

    Tammy Duckworth, on Washington Post’s website, on leadership.  (hat tip to Angry Asian Man blog).  I liked this quote from Duckworth, currently US Assistant Secretary of  Veterans Affairs and an Iraq War veteran (link to transcript):

    Being a leader is identifying who you are, bringing your strengths, but also identifying the strengths of the people that you’re working with and really building on that and pulling together a team. And just forgetting about what other people are saying about how you should be and how you’re supposed to be, just bring your own strengths to it.

    Another hat tip to Angry Asian Man blog: Virginia Tech’s Ed Wang has been drafted by the Buffalo Bills, making him the NFL’s first Chinese American.

    Last, but not least, another hat tip to Angry Asian Man blog (but I’ll also say that I got an e-mail from NAPABA about this too): NAPABA wanted people to reach out to the Senate about the confirmation proceedings on Goodwin Liu’s appointment to the 9th Circuit appellate court.

    As with Kagan, the opposition’s trying to argue that Liu’s lack of judicial experience is some kind of concern and how his academic writings somehow are problematic of how he’d be as a judge.  I don’t think either argument works, and hope that we’ll have a second Asian American at the appellate level soon, without the politics driving people batty.

  • Shanghai Restoration Project – LIVE

    Source: www.youtube.com
        Saw these guys live yesterday – a combo of electronica and Chinese music, especially 1930's Shanghai jazz    
  • NBC Cancels ‘Law & Order’ – Media Decoder Blog – NYTimes.com

    Source: mediadecoder.blogs.n…
        OK, it's official – what a sad day for New Yorkers! Chances are you either were on the show, work at a place depicted in the show, or live in a neighborhood where you saw them shooting the show. I made it through Crim Pro watching this show. Now we are stuck with the head-slapping yougottabekidding fakeness that is CSI:NY.    
  • Sandy Lam, Chyi Yu, Teresa Carpio & Prudence Lau Mei Kwan – I Swear

    Source: www.youtube.com
        Early morning soundtrack – TGIF    
  • Sesame Street: Lena Horne and Kermit Sing Bein' Green

    Source: www.youtube.com
        Today's soundtrack – RIP Lena Horne.