Category: Brooklyn

Last night’s “Angel” – 100th episode – wow. I say “Wow” because of the ending. (spoiler alert; wait for it; skip if you don’t want to be spoiled; then again, I won’t give away everything…) – Lindsey the ex-Wolfram & Hart lawyer steps up on his revenge against Angel (not just on Team Angel). Basically, it’s total recall time – if one doesn’t remember the first season, we get all kinds of reminders – Lindsey’s recollection of his first meeting of Angel (not a good memory for either man); a hint of Doyle, Angel’s late sidekick, who was sorely missed, psychic, half-demon/half-human, and all-Irish (more than Angel ever was, since his accent thoroughly disappeared during his 200 year lifetime); and, more importantly, the return of Cordelia, the girl sidekick who joined Angel from “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” and spent the past year in a coma (on the show, that is). (Wesley, the other carry-over from “Buffy” didn’t come in until season 2 and even Spike and Harmony are late-comers).

The storytelling was quite compelling – as it seems as if Angel has finally regained the sense of self, thanks to Cordelia (Lindsey always brings out the most compelling feelings out of Angel). Spike realizes that Lindsey has strung him all along – but, does this mean anything less about Spike’s mission to do good and be good? (Spike has to be good on his own – intrinsic good, for goodness’s sake! – after all, he can’t just be good because he wants to attract some girl or continue his rivalry with Angel – i.e., due to outside forces). It was also nice to see Cordelia recall her own journey – from being shallow California girl to a woman determined to make good win. And, then came the surprising end. Wow.

Quibbles – really, answers are not fulfilled. Angel is still heading Wolfram & Hart, and both the forces of good and evil are after him and the team (the good are after Team Angel because Team Angel’s working for the evil firm, and the evil are after the team because they are/were good; there’s no end to the confusion for Team Angel, but no one but Angel and Spike get it? Wesley seems close to realizing and being disturbed by the dilemma of working in the gray area). There were moments I would have liked more of – the rest of the team ought to realize what Angel’s feeling; I would have liked to see if they’re feeling the dilemma too – that the ambiguity they’re in isn’t pleasant stuff. I mean, come on – why don’t Gunn, Fred and Lorne realizing that working for Wolfram & Hart is going to suck them in before they start changing the world, as they claim they’re doing? Wesley’s so close to feeling it, short of expressing it. Worse, the rest of Team Angel still have amnesia about what had happened the past two seasons, relating to Angel’s son Connor – but at least Cordelia called Angel on the decision of wiping everyone’s memories about the past two seasons. I would have also liked to have had more Cordelia moments with the rest of the gang – but, for whatever reason (in real-life or in terms of the storyline), she was available for only the one episode.

Next week – Angel and Spike recall their World War II days, when Spike was still evil (and apparently working for the Nazis – odd, since he’s so British, but not so odd because he was evil) and when Angel was really struggling to atone for all his sins (by apparently working for the Americans). The teaser preview looked good (although it looked eerily like a commercial for “Pearl Harbor,” a movie I so definitely have not and probably won’t be seeing, since it didn’t seem that good; unless, someone tells me otherwise?).

Can’t believe I watched yet another episode of “The Apprentice” – there’s something eerie that made it compelling to actually watch it, even though I don’t like the show. Producer Mark Burnett (the same guy who brought us “Survivor”) is very good about editing his series so that there’s suspense.

Finally, an “ER” episode that didn’t end in complete misery. Hmm.

Tomorrow – the end of NBC’s “Ed”? Well, it was a nice series; catch it, especially if you’ve been enjoying it the last four years and would like the end. What is it with NBC letting decent shows go but keeping the not-so quality stuff?

It’s raining in New York. That’s significant because it’s no longer freezing, even though some stupid punk groundhog Phil from PA says that we’re going to have six more weeks of winter.

Super Bowl: Ads were not that great. As a whole they were really not that inspirational. The geezers fighting over the potato chips was just wrong. Homer was good, but didn’t really change the way I thought. The two that were thought provoking were the shardsoglass.com anti-smoking ad and I kind of liked monster.com’s ID card sequence. I can’t believe that Bermuda spent the $30M for an ad though.

The Janet Jackson thing was totally bogus — everyone knew exactly what they were doing. I generally do like the CBS lineup these past 2 seasons (you can’t pry me away from the Amazing Race with a crowbar, and CSI and Joan of Arcadia are great), and this will help them on their entertainment side, but ultimately is going to hurt them on the news side — Ed Murrow and Ed Sullivan are rolling over in their graves, and Walter Cronkite would be if he had one.

Oh yeah, the game — what an awesome game! Although I had no idea who anyone was, it was the best game in at least 5 years. They were so craving for points that they were going for 2 point conversions after the touchdown, which almost never happens nowadays. You also have to think that there were 8 touchdowns and 2 field goals: the ball travelled 1,000 yards during that game — that’s more than half a mile. I don’t think I could have run a half mile like that.

I was down 25 fan in the pre-game mahjong fest, but in honor of Mastercard, I won a Homer Simpson Braineez talking head on the first half box (thanks Carolina for coming through, even though I’m sorry you didn’t go the distance).

Super Tuesday: I think that it’s obvious Kerry’s the annointed one at this point. Edwards has been trying for a stealth 2nd, but Kerry has the single package.

My observations of the Super Bowl ads, as I was actually watching (more or less with some attention) the game:

– Commercial for Hugh Jackman’s “Van Helsing” movie – interesting, but felt more like “Look at our CGI effects!” rather than an actual promotion for a movie (and I didn’t exactly come out of it liking the CGI effects either).

– Commercial for Budweiser about The Donkey That Wanted To Be a Clydesdale – cute.

– I got real tired of these Levitra ads (for those who don’t know, it’s a Viagra rival, which may or may not make it an important product to be aware of).

– I also got real tired of the ads promoting all the CBS shows. Yeah, I know that this was exactly why any network would purchase the rights to air the Super Bowl, but I was only able to swallow so much of self-promotion.

– Charmin commercial: a quarterback was about to take the ball, only he was too busy admiring the touch and feel of the slip of Charmin toilet paper that was just hanging on the backside of another player. Whistle was blown and a guy in the Charmin bear suit was waving his roll of Charmin paper at the camera, evidentally proud of his little prank. Sideline folks proceeded to chase the bear down, as a vendetta for the prank. This was a strangely funny ad that kept one’s mind on the product.

– Staples commercial – happily mocking Godfather types and office supply managers, wherein office workers bribed the gatekeeper of the office supplies with doughnuts, cookies, and muffins for paper, pens, and paper clips. This one guy asked for a folder, but regrettably only had half a Danish; he was given only half a folder (ripped before his very eyes). The next day, the guy returned, with a bodyguard at his side; guy announced, “I went to Staples and everyone will know it too!” “And, what do you want from me?” said the gatekeeper. Bodyguard guy approached Gatekeeper guy nose to nose, and said, “I want a cream puff…” A funny ad that stayed on point! Go Staples, land of cheap office products.

– I didn’t care for any of the Pepsi commercials I managed to catch – I thought that they were a little silly. “Yeah, I’m going to continue wrongfully downloading music!” said the adolescent types toasting their Pepsis at us viewers. Oh, go away, kids.

– I also didn’t get the AOL Super Fast (or whatever they were called) ads. They were supposed to promote AOL’s faster connection to the Internet, by showing how this geeky guy tried to get his dad, a grungy mechanic/motorcyclist, to understand what Super Charging means (Dad thinks it’s something more useful to his line of work and cannot understand Geeky Son); at one point, Dad connected a little motorized wheelchair to an AOL server to watch it go super. Geeky Son sat in said chair and, of course, it wasn’t like the wheelchair’s motor will go any faster (or maybe it did; I don’t remember)… Oh, well, the ad completely failed to make me care for AOL.

– Commercial for Viggo Mortenson’s “Hildago” – already a movie that I was looking forward to seeing (having seen the trailer for it at the movie theaters) – but the commercial had more clips and gave a nice feel that made the excitement even stronger. Ooh, Viggo!

– Cute MasterCard commercial with the Simpsons – Homer did his chores: oil change, costing X amount of money; hair cut for $75; and then… Voiceover Guy stated, “Chores done quicker to spend extra time with one’s family: priceless.” Problem is, Homer was spending quality time at Moe’s and guzzling beer. Homer grumbled, “Okay, Voiceover Guy,” and marched out of Moe’s, slamming the door at the face of Hans Moleman (the little pruney old man with thick glasses). Hehehe. Good Simpsons feature, essentially.

Conclusion: All in all, the ads weren’t too bad, I guess. I’d give them a better than average rating. The ads as a whole had nothing too tasteless, but they weren’t exactly terribly stand-up-and-cheer exciting either.

For other views, consider the Super Bowl ad analysis in Slate.com’s “Ad Report”. Among other ads, which I completely forgot about or haven’t commented on: Slate.com’s Seth Stevenson noted the Muppets’ Pizza Hut ad (I cooed over seeing Kermit, personally); the Monster.com ads (I didn’t particularly care for those, but then again, it was nice to see Monster.com trying to stay in there after having seen too many CareerBuilder.com ads over the past couple of weeks); and the Chevrolet ads with the kids with soap in their mouths (I thought it was funny).

Oh, and the Super Bowl itself – congratulations to New England (wasn’t rooting for them, hardly against them, since they were good during playoffs and heavy favorites to win the Lombardi trophy). Congratulations to Carolina for trying (but, you know, someone had to lose). Pretty good game, despite the boring first half-hour (although, I still don’t understand football – which makes me, what, a stereotypical female? Obviously, I don’t fully appreciate defensive football, or even football with teams I don’t root for). Next week is the NFL’s Pro-Bowl, but that’s anti-climactic – as a tv thing, it isn’t that exciting watching any bunch of All-Stars who do show up to play football (touch football, really, because no one wants to get hurt during the off-season) in the middle of Hawaii when the season’s all over. Humph. I guess there’s the entertainment value to the football fans who can’t give up. Until next time…

Finally saw “Master and Commander: Far Side of the World” yesterday night. I’m glad it was re-released due to the Oscar nominations, so that I can see for myself if it is good.

And, yes, quite a good movie – a good old fashioned yarn, starring Russell Crowe as British Captain Jack Aubrey of the HMS Surprise against the French ship Archeron during the Napoleonic war. British actor Paul Bettany played Dr. Maturin, Aubrey’s erstwhile sidekick and chief medical officer/naturalist (in the pre-Darwin era). The movie adapted two of the Aubrey/Maturin book series by the late Patrick O’Brien. The movie had it all: ship to ship battles to excite the viewers; graphic violence and major pain tolerance, for those poor early 19th century sailors; loaded with male bonding (although, Russell Crowe wasn’t too bad for the female eyes, even if he had to pack in some weight to play Aubrey).

I haven’t read the books, so it wasn’t like I could make a comparison of accuracy or whatnot. Time magazine had done the rundown on the comparison awhile back (the big quibble for the Aubrey/Maturin fan base was that Maturin wasn’t his spy self, but I thought he was all right anyway; Aubrey wasn’t shown as being bigger (physically) or a womanizer, but this wasn’t that kind of movie). No big heterosexual romance or big debate about how wrong war is – it’s all about fighting the enemy (the French); that the world is black and white and right and wrong; and friendship is grand, in spite of or due to bonding through the hard times.

I don’t know if “Master and Commander” will win the Oscar for best picture, but it’s a good movie.

NY Times’ op ed from Saturday, 1/31/04; should NASA find some way to maintain the Hubble telescope, when the president of the US has asked it to work on the moon and Mars? Not an easy question, when nothing NASA has to do comes cheap. Meanwhile, the little rover Opportunity is on the move in Mars…

Frank Rich’s column in Sunday NY Times on the “sanctity of marriage” – what is it, what’s with the hypocrisy about it in American society today (particularly when reality tv shows keep matching couples and then airing their weddings and so forth makes marriage a farce), and what have we come to in this world when “marriage” is just another item or issue that’s turned into a target for all kinds of pot shots. I don’t necessarily agree or disagree with Rich; I just thought it was an interesting read.

Bring on the Super Bowl; enough with the hype and the articles about how the teams match up and how this is the battle of the ex-NY Giants coaches, etc. And, while it’s nice to read about how Carolina Panthers’ Jake Delhomme is a Cinderella player, finally making it to the ball, and how funny it is that the Carolina Panthers have a player whose nickname on the ex-XFL was “He Hate Me” and how New England Patriots’ Tom Brady is a great quarterback and all that, at the end of the day, it’s about who “Survives”…

This week’s “Angel” – amazingly powerful stuff. I got so wrapped up in the episode, carried away by the storyline as it related to the whole Angel/Buffy mythos, it was so scary and graphic. The writing was so good, the acting – good delivery of good lines… So, I’m blurting all this, while I still can (so, before you move on, spoiler alert! – although, as usual, I won’t give away everything) …

This week’s episode was a sort-of further update of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” continuing ideas from its series finale last spring. “Buffy” summary – Buffywas long burdened by her role as the Chosen One (Faith, another Slayer, also shared the burden, but came to be more tempted by the dark side, so Buffy felt really alone with what she stubbornly felt was her mission alone; it didn’t help that Buffy came back from the dead twice – no one else can share in that experience). Buffy, in the season before the last season, returned from the dead and promised to show the world to Dawn, her sister who’s literally “The Key” (as, revealed in the prior season, a mystical object in human form sharing the Slayer’s bloodline so that the Slayer can protect her). But, the promise was sidelined by the latest quest. Buffy, Buffy, Buffy. Ah, but the series finale: but then Buffy unleashed the power of the Slayer to all Potential Slayers, to defeat the First Evil. Now, there are Chosen Ones; it’s Slayer (re: Girl) Power for all the Girls who have the Potential in them. The victim need not be victimized. The innocent can stand strong.

And, with Spike, Buffy’s other vampire-with-a-soul boyfriend, on “Angel,” I thought all the Buffy references in “Angel” hinted that Buffy’s story continued somewhere out there, as she was freed from carrying the burden alone; she’s with Dawn, traveling in Europe, finding more Slayers to pass on Slayer Power lessons, and finally keeping the promises she made to Dawn and her gang. More than ever, this week’s “Angel” episode was like a Buffy episode without Buffy. The guest-appearance of Andrew, the once-evil, always hapless geek of “Buffy” only enhanced the Buffiness of the episode. Andrew visits Los Angeles to help Team Angel in a serious situation (more below). Spike warns Andrew – “don’t tell Buffy I’m back; I’ll tell her when I’m good and ready.” Considering that she watched him die last season, I’m kind of wondering what Spike’s really thinking. All this Buffiness…

But, don’t lose sight of the fact that this is “Angel.” Its charactistic usual broodiness, darkness, and all-out graphic violence are still there. Team Angel, via their Evil Law Firm of Wolfram & Hart, become aware of Dana, a Psychotic Slayer – a teenaged girl so traumatized by her kidnapping/torture experience and loss of her murdered family that she has been at a mental hospital the past several years. When Buffy unleashed Slayer Power, it awakened the Dana’s Potential Power – but not in a good way. Thus, Dana goes psycho to hunt and kill anyone, particularly men, because it was a man who so tortured her when she was a child. She has the power to do more harm than good.

Spike doesn’t realize that Dana’s a Slayer at first; he fights her, and she goes more psycho, because in her mind, she’s sure Spike was the man who destroyed her; worse, she has the memories of the past Slayers who Spike killed back when he was evil. So, Dana brutalizes Spike horribly. Does he deserve the punishment, if he did indeed harmed Dana to begin with- making her the monster that she thus became? (she’s at least a feral Slayer, without the training and moral restraint – which is scary) .

Lowdown: Spike manages to talk through to Dana, before she dusts him or hacks other body parts. Dana, it seems, mixed the memories of the Slayers with her own actual memories ( she understandably knows what Spike is – but not exactly how he related to her). Angel arrives on time, revealing info that her actual torturer was fortunately taken down by the police. Spike is rushed to the Wolfram & Hart hospital. Angel tries to take Dana for treatment, but Andrew and his troupe of teen Slayers claim Dana – she is a Slayer for their custody, even if she has gone psycho.

Powerful moment: Angel and Wesley, Angel’s sidekick, protest at first. Irony alert, since Wesley would have had Andrew’s job of overseeing Slayers, had Wesley not messed things up with his overseeing of Faith and joined Team Angel. More irony: Andrew says to Angel and his man Wesley, “Thanks for helping us get Dana, but you guys are evil now; you work for Wolfram & Hart!” When Angel insists that he would call Buffy to veto Andrew, Andrew gives Angel the worst slap in the face: “Buffy knows – she authorized me to take Dana. We don’t trust you anymore.” (I’m paraphrasing; the whole presentation was far better than I’m putting it).

Andrew doesn’t have the same Angel baggage than, say, others of Team Buffy (Xander, for instance, has his trust issues with Angel), so the powerful kick at Angel isn’t nearly as strong as it could have been. And, despite the graphic violence and flashbacks, are we viewers supposed to be relieved that Spike, who was admittedly really evil back in the day, was not the evil person Dana thought he was in her own life? Is Angel finally admitting that he’s no longer on the side of Good, when his own beloved rejects him? (without Buffy being there, I thought it was real easy to imagine her discomfort with the idea of Angel with Wolfram & Hart and her fear that he returned to evil, no matter his justification of working to bring down evil from the inside; does anyone even know the sacrifice he made to do this?). And, can Dana ever be rescued, mentally and spiritually?

A vampire-to-vampire talk: Spike and Angel wonder if Dana could ever be reclaimed, since she has been so scarred by the dark side. Spike recognizes that Dana and her family were not among his victims, yet Spike pauses and concedes that his problem, pre-soul days, was that he never thought about what evil really meant. Angel highlights his own horrible past – as the evil vampire Angelus, he “reveled in evil in all its forms” – Angelus was worse than Spike, in Angel’s mind (and perhaps to most others too). Angel’s soul curses Angel to feel guilt for all the crimes he committed is his eternal sentence for those very crimes.

Spike, as other critics note, chose to have his soul back due to love (or at least something more than lust) for Buffy; he hasn’t been haunted by his victims like Angel has been – but maybe Spike will start feeling it (in the Buffy/Angel world, no one gets away with anything). By knowing what evil means, maybe Spike would now understand and truly appreciate what it means to be the Champion of Good. Will Spike learn that being on the side of good isn’t just about vying with Angel for the girl – that doing good is a good in and of itself? That fighting evil is a worthwhile goal? That there is such a thing as evil? What happened to those gray areas that Wesley was talking about the very week before? Angel has to bring his team up to speed about his concerns, but maybe it won’t happen too soon?

Next week is the big 100th Angel episode. Cool.

For Worse

Judith Shulevitz weighs in on whether or not candidate’s wives are fair game to the public wondering who to support. I don’t quite understand her rant.

I think it must be really quaint to view the family as a single entity with a husband and wife (or 2 parents) and children (with slight variances to this theme). A lot of people in today’s society to think of the family unit as 2 individuals plus accessories (could be kids, could be homes, could be anything in the world). Color me old fashioned and traditionalist, but the family unit is not 2 individuals going about their lives; it is a single entity with a common goal and working toward that common goal. The root of family’s destruction stems from the idea that our own selfish goals and needs are attainable and do not need to be sacrificed nor compromised. We are, after all, highly capable individuals living to carpe diem.

As a single guy, I believed that people ought to take advantage of all opportunities, explore all possibilities and not limit oneself. Life is an adventure and it should be lived in that manner. You know, Captain Kirk style! On the other hand, I have also maintained that one of the single most selfless acts an individual can make is to get married. How do I arrive to this conclusion? Simple. Going from a single existence (e.g. man or woman is an island) to a shared one requires immediate and uncompromising sacrifice of one’s own interest. No longer can you consider yourself in a vacuum, or make unilateral decisions about how to live your life. You know need to consider your life partner. A successful marriage requires input from another person(s), absolutely needs compromise to sustain it, and requires communication beyond your inner cranial sanctum. This is not easy to do. As divorce rates and polls clearly show, it’s neither easy, nor successful. The two individual model has been an abject failure.

So when in a marriage, it is even more important to engage in family planning (i.e. how many kids?), financial planning (i.e. more than, do I have enough to hit up the ATM machine) etc. All of this requires considering a lot of issues beyond the “me, myself and I” person. So when someone embarks upon a political journey to the White House, it is perfectly normal to ask, well, who’s his/her other (better) half? Everyone knows, that it takes a strong and successful partnership to make a marriage work.

=YC

Super Bowl’s coming. Yes, there’s football, there’s “Survivor” (coming after the football) and there are the ads in between. Hmm… Hopefully this year’s Super Bowl’s ads will be interesting; I recall not being particularly thrilled by last year’s.

The other day, I finally saw the latest Priceline ad, the one YC referred in his commentary (I think I’ve linked it correctly). Amusing!

Ad’s summary: Priceline executives are trying to bring excite back to Priceline.com. Actor William Shatner is brought into a meeting with them; they tell him that they’re taking Priceline in a new direction. “My Priceline?!” says Shatner. Said executives reassure him that it’s still Priceline, still name your own price and all that, but more; so, Shatner’s no longer in the equation? “But, who can replace ME?” says Shatner. Leonard Nimoy emerges, “Hi, Bill. Let’s do lunch.” Shatner looks up, “Hi, Len. Sure. Lunch. What? Wait. Len?!” Nimoy, the new Priceline man? Hmm. Only Spock would do in Kirk. I loved the interplay; and, Nimoy and Shatner seemed like they were having way too much fun. And, yep, Shatner’s still one scary man.

Check out Slate.com’s latest “Ad Report”: scribe Seth Stevenson reviews the Linux ads – the ones with the weird platinum little boy (Linux himself) loading up info from such wise sorts as Penny Marshall (huh? how is she wise?); Henry Louis Gates (which is cool, since it’s not often that a professor gets to be in a mainstream commercial and outside of PBS or Sunday morning news shows); and others like Muhammed Ali. The latest Linux ad has the little boy inserted in weird black/white colored photos or whatnot. Apparently, they’re not just Linux ads; they’re IBM’s way of selling the brandname on CEO’s and other such types to irritate Microsoft or something. Stevenson thinks they’re cool ads. The first one was interesting to me; the latest ones looks surreal – just my opinion. Take it or leave it. I liked the Slate article, all in all.

Ctrl-Alt-Del Inventor To Retire From IBM (Slashdot)

Dr. David Bradley, leader of the original IBM PC engineering team and creator of the “CTRL-ALT-DEL” interrupt key combo, is retiring from IBM to teach. He didn’t really place much importance to CTRL-ALT-DEL, thinking that only programmers would have any real need to use it. Little did he know that it would become ubiquious (for better or worse) in operating Microsoft products. It’s used for getting out of stuck or “blue screen” situations, logging into a multiple users system, and showing active programs and CPU usage. The technical and historical reasons for the key combo’s versatility are at this web site, but basically it’s the only keypress that can’t be paused or interrupted by something else the computer’s doing (although in practice, I’ve managed some real doozies ).

NY Times’ Quotation of the day:

“We are about to embark on what is arguably the coolest geologic field trip in history.”
DR. STEVEN W. SQUYRES, the Mars mission’s principal science investigator.

See also corresponding article. I wouldn’t think that the words “cool” and “geologic field trip” would go together, but Mars is a different world, after all.

I was actually watching a little “Smallville” tonight. Could it be – a hint of Batman – is the character making an appearance? (my favorite superhero anyway)….

The NYC snow texture was something like those Dunkin’ Donut white powder doughnut – fluffy and crumbly. On unshoveled sidewalks in Brooklyn this morning, it was ankle deep. Not that bad a commute though. In Manhattan, it’s slushy muck, with the sidewalks looking nothing like it is in Brooklyn.